LIAQAT ALI CHUGTAI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY RAILWAYS
Arts 10A, 14 and 199 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 9 (2) (a) Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1973, RR 7, 7A and 8 Constitutional Court Evaluation of the integrity and performance of public employees, depending on the personal opinion of employees and the perception of members, such as the scope of the virtual jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, etc. The validity and legality of the Central Selection Board for such evaluation by the Central Selection Board consciously As such, adopt a policy that considers the integrity and dignity of officers to rely on the personal views and opinions of members. The performance of public servants was not established by the record, ie, the evidence presented to the Central Selection Board for the recruitment of officers employed by the officers before them, or by the Central Selection Board for the purpose of furnishing the employees by the Board. It had nothing to do with the service dossier, which had to carefully review the dossier of the officers placed before the board's Central Selection Board and prepare a plan for its formation. The collective opinion, but the reasons given for their supremacy were based solely on the personal opinion of the members and it appears that the service dossier was not considered a Central Selection Board, consisting of 12 members from different provinces. And it was hard to imagine. That all members knew about the inability and performance of public servants, therefore, the personal opinion of some members was apparently adopted freely without the knowledge of the members and without any restriction on the service record. About the Government Employees Board
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
