Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD TALHA ADIL versus MIAN MUHAMMAD LUTFI

Article 24 (1973), Article 185 (2) (d) of the constitution of Pakistan, submission of gold defense savings certificate, purchase of trial court of power for investment in gold scheme, gold in cash Instead of submitting, the trial court purchased the certificate and submitted it within the stipulated time. After verifying the matter, at the request of the vendor, the trial court dismissed the case for not depositing Zarim Som in cash. The High Court put aside the verdict. And the case was approved by the trial court and after receiving the trial court's remand, it was decided that under section 24 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act 1991, the promoter can only collect cash, section 24 of the Punjab pre-emption. The Language Imputation Act, 1991, was used to negotiate the sale of 1 / 3rds (gold e-som) in cash, but no exception to the trial court's authority that a pre-emptor could The money deposited should be invested in profitable securities. y After the payment of the cash payment, the trial court was made ill to allow the advance emperor to purchase the Defense Saving Certificate and place it on the record promoter following the order, and keep the record savings certificate on record. The trial court cannot be deliberately convicted, nor can the trial court comply with an order which was illegal to attract the sentencing provision under consideration by the law, which is realistic and Legal position and jurisdiction was fully appreciated. The High Court did not suffer jurisdiction or any inherent error or error of law, in the circumstances best law firms from Lawrence pur lawyer