Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SH. MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus SITARA COMMISSION SHOP


Section 32 was issued by a company registered under the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXXI, RR 2 and 3 Ordinance of Suits Companies for Receipt of checks, 1984, but without directing the company A lawsuit was filed against The defendants / directors of the party did not refuse to issue the check, but they were granted conditional leave to appear and defend the trial, which, during the trial, was granted by the High Court to the appropriate defendants. Acknowledging that the company did not name the company was not a party to the plaintiff because the defendants had acknowledged their responsibility, their guidance could be objected to after the permit was banned. The leave order was finalized by the High Court in the review filed by the defendants. Maintaining the trial court's order / order by the High Court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Kundina lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.