Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN LAWYERS FORUM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Articles 260 and 184 (3) to the Supreme Court under the Preamble Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act (III of 2003), President's Another Office Act (VII of 2004), Article 184 (3) (petitioner's constitution) According to Article 6 of this Constitution, the President was responsible for the action against Pakistan by the Supreme Court for violating the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of President Zafar Ali Shah. The announcement of the referendum order 2002 was illegal and in violation of the constitutional provisions, and so was the order without validity. That General Pervez Musharraf failed to hand over power to the citizens. It was appropriate to strike the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 2003 on the basis that it was enacted by Parliament which was not properly constituted and this was a violation of the Constitution's infrastructure. That clauses (7) and (8) of Articles 41 of the Constitution were in an inconsistent dispute with Article 43, which was a high section and, therefore, it must be convened in accordance with the constructive doctrine. That the President held another Office Act, 2004, was controversial in the Constitution and on the basis that it was a violation of the Constitution, there was no such item in the Federal Legislative List, acting as a jurisdiction. Could For its implementation, as it was outside the scope of the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution, it was agreed by an acting president who lacked constitutional authority. That the Chief of Army Staff could not be President Pakistan because the post of Chief of Army Staff was not excluded from the definition of the Service of Pakistan under Article 260 of the Constitution, as such President was disqualified from being elected. As Parliament and best advocate from Kamokey lawyer