Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

STATE versus TANVEER ANJUM


Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, the cancellation of the accused was listed in the FIR, with the specific role of snatching the complainant's taxi while providing medical assistance. Excuses were to be rented. Fake patient articles in the hospital were recovered from the complainant The complainant had no hostility or motive to the accused. In this case, the offense against the accused falls under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), for CRPC reasons. However, the sessions court granted bail to the accused, which was against the principles that were granted by the high courts as a bail granted to the accused by the sessions court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.