Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ ALI versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER

Sections 154 and 157 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition, on the recording of the second FIR and the termination of the first FIR, the applicant alleged that he had notified the police of joining the first FIR. Was not given, but the relevant Section H himself entered the story which the FIR was only to benefit the accused, with whom it was said that the Section HO was allegedly in the company of the petitioner. That the first FIR should be abolished and the second FIR should be directed to enter the prescribed register, it will be confirmed and the F The authenticity of the version listed in the IR will be crushed. Not only during the investigation, but also after the filing of an FIR in the court law, no other FIR can usually be filed, but there are instances where the court intended for another FIR, clause 154. The purpose and purpose of the enactment was directed to enroll. Then the other part was that providing information would bring the law into motion and the police would move in. The truth or falsehood would be eliminated. After investigating the matter, whether the information was false, with no base, unlawful purpose or Police had to find out about the lie and if it was found to be false, action could be taken under Section 182, PPC and other constitutional sections of PPC. In the present case, the police against the complainants will come to the conclusion that after the court approves the hearing, the fact that the first information has been reported by the applicant or the second information is incorrect, the court will be against the complainant. Tough action family advocate from Bat Khela lawyer