Find a Lawyer

SAQIB MUKHTAR versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Articles 199, 184 (3), 9, 10, 14, 4, 25, 5 and 244 show the facts of the detention corpus application showing the strange circumstances of the case where the incident took place between the Danteons and the two army personnel. An FIR was filed between one of the Army officers mentioned above and the police raided and arrested four of the seven dentis while three, themselves, appeared before the police and obtained bail before arrest. After he disappeared from the scene and remained dentate for more than a month. Despite several previous orders which were not submitted, however, they were produced in the High Court, yet the applicants were satisfied, they were presented in court and they did not want to make any statement that the petitioners were present. The prospective lawyer wants to leave. The application of the habeas corpus under which the petitioners were directed by the High Court, dealt with the application accordingly and observed that in the present case, the fundamental rights of hypothetical fundamental rights were covered under Articles 9, 10, 14 and 25 of the Constitution of the Irons. Violation of Reading with Article 4 was violated. That all citizens of Pakistan have the right to act according to the law and no one was above the law, therefore, if any person commits a crime, it should be prosecuted according to the law and only with the relevant agencies. If government officials in any department or organization take the law into their own hands, how can powerful people be prevented from doing so and that everything needs to be done within a system, and the High Court has strictly What is observed. Past and present, the level of civilization of any nation best advocate from Bisham lawyer