SHAFAQAT ALI ALIAS ASHFAQ ALIAS SHAKI versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) definition of evidence was fully explained in the presence of the day and the delay in filing the FIR, the delay in filing the FIR was fully explained on record, Will have no negative impact on the reality of the alleged eyewitness version. Since the complainant's name was not found in the victim's medico legal report, it was advised that the complainant was not present on the spot, saying that the dispute was merely speculative because the victim's nephew objected. The person who listed the initial Medico legal report who brought the deceased to hospital did not necessarily mean that the complainant was not going with his son at the time, the deceased's nephew was a close relative of the deceased. What would be the person who brought the deceased to the hospital and mentioned his name? In this context, the complainant does not have to exclude the possibility of going to the hospital with the injured son, in complete harmony with all material and important details of the incident such as the day, time, place and manner of the incident. Found, no material or significant contradictions or contradictions were identified under the circumstances. On this occasion, his testimony and his presence were fully proved, the defendant's witness, who showed credible testimony, was rightly relied upon by the trial court, the accused pleading his sudden grave and sudden outrage. Could not install because it was not installed on a version. During the trial, Saeed's request was properly rejected by the trial court, as medical evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Ludhan lawyer