Find a Lawyer

RAHEEL RASHID versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 31D Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 196 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was involved in a case involving illegal debt to the accused along with his co-accused which could not be distributed. The accused faced a similar case with his co-accused in order to exclude him from the scope of the main reference or to attribute them to a different or unrelated conviction, and since the accusations leveled him into an unreasonable debt The Section 31D National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, was also fully applicable in his case, but since no authority or reference was made in this regard, the National Accountability Bureau, by the Governor State Bank. Without such a reference, there was no. Jurisdiction to prosecute the accused until he or she receives such a reference. The withdrawal was not his power, because in the present case the court had to operate under section 31D of the special law, the National Accountability Ordinance itself, the proceedings of 1999 were not abolished, however, the court declared. That the action against the accused is unforgivable. The Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan did not exercise authority, jurisdiction of the National Accountability Bureau or the Accountability Courts in this reference and had no authority or authority to prosecute the accused under this Act unless permitted. Constitutional application dismissed. Accordingly best law firm from Chashma lawyer