IMTIAZ HUSSAIN versus MST. SHAMIM AKHTAR
Section 497 (S) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of the pre-arrest bail of section 489F, admittedly brought a case against the complainant for a permanent injunction under which the Establishment Order was examined by a civil court. Issued or approved in any other way. The defendant, in favor of the complainant, had all the verdict before a competent court which was yet to be decided. The matter related to the accused's crime needs further investigation. The accused was a woman and did not recover anything from her sessions court. He used his discretion correctly. Depending on the principles governing the grant or in favor of the defendant in the case of such relief, the request for the cancellation of the bail granted to the accused was dismissed within the same limits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Bagh lawyer
