Find a Lawyer

SHAHID RASOOL versus STATE

Rule 2302 (b) / 3244 / ?88 / ?9 evidence Of the eight accused, five were already acquitted by the trial court and the appeal against their failure was dismissed by the High Court. Of the five witnesses, the complainant was the complainant. One of the deceased's second brother and the other deceased's uncle were both bodyguards of the late witness. The third eye witness died before the trial began. The fourth witness was not presented to the prosecutor, who was the fifth witness Was invited to tea in the presence of a home incident, the prosecution faced controversy, the defendant was injured in all three investigations related to the injuries and offenses of the accused under trial and medical evidence. The sins were found. The five were acquitted and the rest of the accused was on the same grounds and grounds on which it was said that the accused were acquitted and they were also pleading that it was able to charge the enmity between the two parties. Due to the hostile prosecution, the possibility of the accused being lied to in the trial cannot be ruled out. In the circumstances, the accused failed to prove his case beyond the shadow of suspicion, dismissing the charge. Benefited from the suspicion and was ordered to be released property advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer