ADMINISTRATOR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MULTAN THROUGH CITY NAZIM MULTAN versus MESSRS TAWAKKAL & COMPANY THROUGH GHULAM FAREED
The first appeal for late submission of sections & 96 & 100 printing charges was regularly filed with the first appeal period and court fee as directed, but late for the record printing charges. Appeal was excluded from submission of printing charges would be difficult to submit late. In the court, a ground for dismissing the appeal within time, when the time was filed within the court, the first appeal on this ground That was not available in law Was. Applicants are regularly charged a fee on the second appeal notice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Ugoki lawyer