Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 2302/8 308 / evidence 34 The definition of evidence was filed with a delay of fifteen hours while the location of the incident was only five kilometers from the President, both witnesses of the prosecution were not near the residence or the incident. But there were other residents. One of the prosecution's witnesses was the real brother of the victim, while the other was the brother-in-law of the deceased, surrounded by houses, but none of the locations were presented during the trial. The two post-mortem suspects were already against them. The trial court acquitted them on the same evidence and their fate was finalized as neither the state nor the complaining party filed an appeal against it. Was. In the statement under Section 342, the CCP was more respectful and convincing than the defendant's request for relief from the crime. The location of the incident was extremely suspicious and his statements could not be believed because he was closely related to the deceased and he had not given any reprehensible reason for his presence on the spot, the prosecution was without any doubt. Except for his failure to prove his case against the accused, the trial court had pronounced him guilty and was acquitted. Problem law websites from FR DI Khan lawyer