ASIA PERVEEN versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CHINIOT SADDAR DISTRICT JHANG
Section 10 and 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 497 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR petitioner's constitutional petition claims that he, with his own free will, has been accused by the trial court of law. What was the marriage contract The reason is that while she was living happily with her husband and living a quiet life, the respondents had earlier rejected and remarried the marriage contract and subsequently pending the application in the Family Court. Was charged by the defendant in connection with Section H. A. had filed an FIR against her husband / accused under sections 10 and 11 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, Petitioner filed an application under Article 199 of the Constitution to remove this FIR. Before the petition was sought, the alleged marriage with the applicant was examined before the Family Court Best Forum to decide whether the applicant had decided to marry. The respondent was genuine or false. Was a Family Court, in which both parties would be free and independent to present evidence against and against it and the Family Court After examining the matter, the decision will be passed by the High Court. The FIR was stayed pending the decision of the Family Court without any action Or no appeal was filed until the settlement of this appeal, the co-offender, who was said to have been arrested in a criminal case, was admitted on bail, so there is no justification for terminating the FIR, Therefore, the constitutional request was dealt with accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
