Find a Lawyer

SHAHAMAD KHAN versus SH. MUHAMMAD AKBAR

A XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3, O XXI, Rr 12 & 13 Agreement Act (IX of 1872), Sections 134 and 139 suit for the receipt of money on the basis of suit primary note And was allowed to file a lawsuit for defense and to defend the case subject to the protection of his offer. There is a guarantor for the defendant and if it is approved against the defendant and the bond in this case, he or she, his property and the dwelling house will be bound to fulfill the decree. Before the trial court's plaintiff had agreed to the dispute and the defendant stated that he had paid the plaintiff a substantial amount and had no objection if the remaining amount was decided by the judgment of the case. Was, thus, accepted by the plaintiff, accordingly a decree was issued by the executor in execution thereof, and in the proceeding the petition for attachment to the property of the bail was transferred, which executed Challenged the start of the proceedings stating that although he is not on bail, he decides on the lender, but does not He had never worked out that even if a consent decree was approved, he would be liable, according to the bond that the component was clearly initiated that, if a lawsuit was filed, he would be able to act. And that they also bind their property to fulfill the trial court-approved decree No reservation was given in the surety bond that they would be bound only by the order in which the suit was contested. Was approved, there is no rule that in the case of consent law firms from Haroonabad lawyer