SAJEEL-UR-REHMAN versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (VI 1997 XX XX XXVII), Section (a) Definition of Evidence Medical evidence did not accurately calculate the casualty's injuries and, thus, an ocular account of the presence of a forensic expert. Negatively, the recovery of the crime weapon did not result, the incident did not prove to be a trigger, witnesses knowingly involved the accused in the FIR occupying the rear seat of the motorcycle. Attempts were made to explain the characteristics of the accused given by eyewitnesses at the time of the incident. Unless otherwise known, the witnesses are residents of a village located five K Ms away from the incident, their presence was not possible on the occasion of the rules and identification test parade. Conduct principles were not strictly adhered to, PA PAID lost its significance, doubts arising out of an item or circumstance were sufficient to exclude a prosecution case because an accused was in a state Was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Okara lawyer