Find a Lawyer

SALAH-UD-DIN versus STATE

Section 13 Explosive Substances Act (VII of 1908), Section 5 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Evidence Defined In this case both the prosecution's witnesses belonged to the police department and, despite prior information, did not seem to be That no attempt was made to be independent or affiliated with the recovery proceedings, unwanted testimony from the eligible area and the provisions of section 103 were not excused for any such error, CRPC only in exceptional cases. The violation of the requirements of Article 103 was stated that the CRPC would make the recovery unreliable. The weapons and ammunition recovered from the possession of the suspects were not sent to the firearms specialist to ascertain whether they were in serviceable condition or not, in the case of prosecution by the Investigation Officer. Is deadly and will invalidate the entire exercise. , Presented by one of the accused and the other by litigation, was a consensus form set as Joxta, then the version of the accused seemed more understandable and convincing and closer to the truth while the prosecution's version was sheer. Was wrong, the evidence of the prosecution is not a test of confidence, the accused can be charged that he did not prove beyond doubt. The trial court set the accused aside, and the accused was acquitted and released. top civil advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer