Find a Lawyer

SAIF-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 141414, the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the review of the bond of bail against the 383 accused for whom the applicant was in bail, failed to appear before the trial and trial court, the applicant's bail bond. Confiscated and proceedings were initiated to recover the bail amount, which failed to collect even the least amount of bail, claiming that the order to impose bail was strict and the court, while imposing a fine, However, the financial condition of the applicants, who have become guarantors, was subject to legal bail. Take their responsibility under the guarantee bond offered by them, after taking this responsibility themselves, it will not be in their mouths that due to their financial condition, they will Cannot pay the bond amount and they are welcome in favor of the accused. And without confiscating any financial benefit, when an accused jumps on a bail bond, the entire amount of the guarantor will be liable for the seizure. The unauthorized verdict was valid, appropriate, legal and did not warrant the intervention of the High Court in its revised jurisdiction. immigration advocate from Swatmingora lawyer