Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SADDIQUE versus STATE

Section 9 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (IX of 1965), Section 13 Testimony of Evidence At the time the accused was driving the vehicle, which recovered marijuana and arms and ammunition, nothing was recovered from the personal possession of the accused. There was no material available in the air record to prove who had the large quantity of marijuana and ammunition and ammunition in the vehicle, there was no evidence to prove that the suspect was carrying cannabis and weapons and ammunition in the vehicle. Was informed that no legal evidence had been brought on record to contact the accused. The basis of his conviction cannot be established in the presence of the accused with the commission of the crime, at the time of the incident without knowledge and the absence of consciousness on the identity of the accused, there is no doubt, alleged drugs, etc. Large quantities of alcohol were recovered, but only because realism cannot be the basis of conviction for the accused's right that there was no enmity or oppression of police witnesses. o The falsely implicated accused were not, in themselves, a strong case for believing that whatever was alleged by the prosecution should be relied directly on them without any evidence support, which was relevant. Was occupying the front seat of the vehicle concerned at the time. He alleged that he got down from the car and disappeared after seeing the police party. D was boarded and disappeared, no one else, but in fact the prosecution inheritance advocates near Noor kot lawyer