MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE versus RETURNING OFFICER
The disqualification of the candidate order passed by the Returning Officer while accepting the nomination papers of Sections 14 (5) and 99 (1) was challenged by the appellant that the degree of BA produced by the candidate was fake and It did not contain the required details and the counter was not signed by the Registrar of the University by the representative of the University Grants Commission, despite the fact of the degree presented by the Calcutta (India) candidate, from where It was said that the degree was not a recognized institution and accordingly the degree is not an acceptable returning officer. ? The ordering officer affirmed the law as confirming the degree of nomination papers as there was no provision for provisional acceptance of the nomination papers, but the degree produced by the candidate did not apply to this degree. Did not show his father's name and was missing an excessive roll number of degree holders, lacking the degree of Urs, who declared him a dubious candidate, in which case, the Member Assembly was not eligible to be elected. Was, the nomination of the candidate nomination form, due to being illegal, nomination of candidate papers Were rejected. General Chat Chat Lounge n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Kohat lawyer