YOUNIS HABIB versus STATE
Articles 409 and 109 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 439 Defining the Evidence The trial court found the accused guilty but considered it necessary to examine the case for trial. As a co-accused, it appears that the trial court did not adhere to the evidence available on record against a partner who was acquitted on the principles laid down by the trial courts, in the interest of justice before passing any order. It was beneficial to issue a notice to acquit the bad accused. To show the reason why an unwarranted decision should not be set aside in his case and his case should be remanded to the trial court for judgment according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer