ABDUL RAZZAQUE versus DR. REHANA SHAHEEN
Section 25 was a general idea of the well-being of minors in which not only their physical and physical well-being, but also their emotional and psychological well-being, the grandparents of minors could not replace the love and affection that was bestowed upon them. Can go Through his / her natural / real parents and unless they did, there were other concerns, usually in the custody of the latter's mother. In the present case, there was a doctor in public employment, government accommodation. I used to live, plus the widow was receiving a pension. She had her own salary and was entitled to free medical and educational benefits for her children, never remarried for her children and nothing came on the record, contrary to her role and reputation, in which case the mother As long as the wishes of the minors were concerned, there was no doubt, this was one of the factors to be considered but could not be decisive in the matter because of the age of the minor it cannot be expected that Where are the principles of welfare?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer