DR. ZAID MEHMOOD versus VICE-CHANCELLOR AND OTHERS
Sections 11A, 15 and 26, the first Constitution of Punjab University, Para 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition alleges that the selection board petitioner was not selected by the applicant as a member of the board ( Respondent) was prejudiced toward the fact that the presence of the respondent's member in the selection board required that the constitution be deemed to be a right, a credibility and a validity or that the allegation of prejudice on the other hand depended on the fact that the inquiry Depending on whether or not a definitive decision can be recorded in the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court is merely assumptions, speculation Could not proceed on the basis of theories and speculations. Neither would be expected to interfere with the administration of the University nor be obliged to assume that the University acted fairly and equitably in the performance of its duties, unless it was shown that It is malicious or a violation of the law or a violation of the principles of natural justice. If this is so, then the High Court will intervene in any matter. Applicant may seek the Chancellor's revision powers under section 11A of the University of Punjab Act, 1973, to resolve his grievances. Discharged.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
