Find a Lawyer

FAKHAR UL JALIL versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER OF MURADPUR SIALKOT

Section 10/13/14 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 216 Police Rules, 1934, CHAP 25, R 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to revoke the trial case established in the FIR It was reported that on receipt of seven police intelligence reports, the officials raided that an aggravated offender was in the hotel's special room, of which one of the accused was the chief executive, alleging that the alleged perpetrator had escaped through a window. Succeeded, but three men, allegedly with a girl, were found naked in this hotel room and a couple engaged in adultery. It was and that the hotel's premises were being used as a fraternity house. The living room was located on the upper floor of the hotel, and it was not possible for the alleged offender. If he was there he would have escaped through the window. It also could not be assumed that the culprit could have managed to escape in the presence of seven policemen, the FIR revealed, when the policemen knocked on the door of the hotel room, which means that it opened itself. The door to the room was not closed. Or if the inside was cold, if it was announced, the perpetrator or the accused were in the room with the women naked, then at least they would have taken some precautionary measures to lock it in or Close it and don't leave it open. A slight knock, it seemed like, in those situations where the story of the aggravated offender was presented to create an excuse to raid the hotel's respective rooms, without seeking a search warrant. inheritance advocates near Mastoi lawyer