STATE OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DEPUTY ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR PAKISTAN versus KENNETH MARSHAL AND 2 OTHERS
Sections 2 (a), 16, 8, 178 and 156 (1), the principal accused of the correctness of the High Court, the Proventive Officer inspected the goods of the co-accused passenger and during the inspection of the cleansing and advance shipment. He was found innocent and he was not. Sent to the trial, the senior intelligence officer, who filed an FIR, was not examined and released without any justification, which raised serious doubts over the truth of the prosecutor's case. Was. The accused could not be convicted directly or indirectly with the commission of the crime and could not be prosecuted merely on suspicion and speculation. The prosecution case failed to present and exhibit the property even though the trial court had several All opportunities were tolerated but the accused was not likely to be proven guilty. Keeping the case against them will be a misuse of the court process, which will not face any malpractice or legal weakness, the Supreme Court dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Allahabad lawyer