Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHOAIB ROOMI versus SECRETARY/ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

RR 4 and 6 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Conduct Regular Discipline Inquiry on Appellant's Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education for Helping Candidates Reduce Was fired from the job. Charges and dismissal orders before the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction were withheld on the basis that the Board adopted the Punjab Government Employees (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1975, and the Board did not formally investigate the High Court. That the appellant ruled. The application was dismissed without discussing the principle of master and servant and the merits of this case. The evidence available to add further evidence to the contrary, irrespective of whether the rule of question has legal status or not, was a recognized fact that it was the board that gave its employees the due process. And chose to deal with the procedure. Under the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules, 1975, the Board cannot be allowed to return to the kind of commitment that its employees have in dealing with them, in disciplinary matters, Punjab adheres to the appointments (qualifications and discipline) by public servants. ) Rules, 1975 The decision of the authorized officers to ban the requirement of regular investigation and to punish the appellant in a slip and summary manner and thereby deprive him of his employment, based on any principle of equity, justice and fair acting. Could not stay Filed against the appellant and consequently the judgment passed by the High Court and the appellant online advocate from Doaaba lawyer