Find a Lawyer

DR. AZAM SARFRAZ versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS

Section 8 [as amended by the Transfer of Field Welfare Program (Field Actions) (XXII of 2001)] Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Service Dismissed 4. The Tribunal, after dismissing the question of jurisdiction over the limitation, dismissed an appeal by a civil servant to the Federal Service Tribunal, which on the occasion of the Federal Service Tribunal's jurisdiction overturned the tribunal's objection. It was, in the Welfare Program Ordinance 1983, that a government employee became a provincial employee because of a population transfer modification. Or was the civil servant referred to the provincial service tribunal but the appeal was dismissed because of the jurisdictional lack of jurisdiction.The Federal Service Tribunal had misinterpreted and misinterpreted the provisions contained in the population transfer. (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001 Amendment NT was implemented from 25 effect 2001, when public employees were employed, prior to the announcement of the Employment Welfare Program (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001. Was fired, while a public servant was fired on 17 17 2001. And the question of its application did not arise with prior effect; for all practical purposes in the case of a Government employee, the provisions of the Population Welfare Program (Field Activities) Ordinance, 1983 in the Transfer of Population Welfare Program Ordinance, 1983 apply. For the implementation of the The complaint was properly referred to the Federal Service Tribunal by appeal and the Federal Service Tribunal's order was rejected, appealing the appeal of the public servant. law websites from FR Peshawar lawyer