DR. ASAD PERVAIZ SHEIKH versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 19 and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Agency, Section 12, Principles of Applicability of Order Restriction under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, Section 12 during execution (2), read with CPC, to recall the order on which the applicant was unaware of the case and the decree and the bank was fraudulently kept away from the case with which Canada. I knew the applicant's address and he knew of this decree. Its general attorney, who was also the director of the borrower's company, also filed the petitioner with a delay of about 18 months. The banking court rejected the application, along with the qualifications, to circumvent the restriction, which, under section 12. (2). The financial institutions (rehabilitation of the financing) did not apply to the proceedings under the Ordinance 2001, however, the applicant was unable to disclose or prove the request for fraud or misrepresentation. Under the provision of Section 12 of the Ordinance 2001, a period of 21 days from the date of the order was provided, ordering the order to be kept separate by the applicant, as the applicant has his own admission that his general attorney has He was aware of it and only knew about it, the Financial Institutions (Financial Recovery) Ordinance Even though his request was out of bounds he could not be ignorant of the proceedings against him as, under the principles of the Agency, the knowledge of a permanently appointed agent was the knowledge of his principal and vice versa. \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
