Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADIR KHAN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, MILLAT TRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED

Section O1 (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Section 46 and 48 erman Permanent Worker, Resolution of Complaints, Appeal to the High Court if a worker who is acting against a permanent office and of a permanent nature Performing duties. And successfully completed his trial period, but did not immediately press for a permanent job, fearing he could avoid his employer's frustrating situation. If the employer was not ready to confirm it immediately, it would rather serve quietly with something to encourage the employer's more trust and confidence. He will not lose his right to be permanent, simply because he has suffered a bit of grief. Because the rules of equity, waivers and prejudices, etc., regarding the delay in the enforcement of legal rights, will not come in its way unless it is a matter of an express or overtact act by a laborer. Who would bring the matter under the auspices of the above belief and was properly defended by the employer in his written statement and he was able to prove the same workman who was either a probationer or a temporary employee and other In any case, being eligible for permanent recruitment would certainly have the right at any time, but during the continuation of its service, ask the employer to make a permanent and, if the requirement is not met, legal restrictions without limitation. Can be adopted as a risk. In the present case, except for the appellant's own statements or in one or two cases, the statements of the union leaders, there was no independent or probative evidence to prove that the appellant was in permanent positions. advocates from Tarbela lawyer