MUHAMMAD ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus STATE
The accused's name was not mentioned in the FIR of section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/460/34 bail, grant of further investigation; both the prosecution witnesses who were eye witnesses Once in the FIR to support this story, but after that they changed their direction Prosecutors' witnesses who were closely with the victim and the complainant, claiming that they had heard the plot to kill the victim, But it did not report the complainant or the deceased until the incident took place. The extra-judicial confession was made instead of the accused's father and other accomplices, the father would take his three sons to confess that they could be used against him. The story could not be swallowed by the prosecutor. Hardly increased, nothing was recovered from the accused. The investigation by the DSP accused was never found innocent and was never declared a fugitive and his late arrest could not be used as an advertisement. A felony cannot be criminalized; bail cannot be stopped if the bail is denied. Benefit, if any, should be guaranteed against the accused who needs further investigation and investigation at the bailout stage. ? Section 497, sub-section (2) of the CCP, the accused was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Head Marala lawyer