Find a Lawyer

DR. AMJAD MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD FIAZ

RR 39 (9) and 40 Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972), Article 3 (2) Maintaining Intra-Court Appeal Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The outcome of proceedings at the end of elections was prepared by the Presiding Officer. The constitutional jurisdiction was challenged before the High Court, which was later changed by the Returning Officer and at the same time the declaration of the result prepared by the Returning Officer was changed by the Presiding Officers Returning Officer. Was to stabilize the results presented. In the polling stations, no appeal, revision or revision is being made against the order of the Returning Officer under R 39 (9), Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2003, against the order of the Returning Officer under the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2003. The Court of Appeal was a competent authority under the constitutional jurisdiction, which had the effect of stripping the right of appeal, must be strictly referred to and if there is any doubt as to the availability of such right Suspicion is to be resolved in favor of the existence of truth. advocates from Tando Adam lawyer