Find a Lawyer

CHIEF EHTESAB COMMISSIONER, CHIEF EHTESAB COMMISISONER\'S SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD versus AFTAB AHMAD KHAN SHERPAO, EX-CHIEF MINSITER, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR

Section 3 (1) (c) (d) The defendant's charge against the accused accused of corruption and misconduct was that he plotted against his co-accused in violation of the housing scheme approved for the construction of public housing. Allotment which caused damage to Housing Project Manish Bench. The accused was acquitted on charges of exercising powers under Section 65DD, CCPC. This allegation was a necessary prerequisite for the filing of Section 3 (1) (c) (D) of the Accountability Act, 1997, whether it was in the public office or by someone else holding its position as a public servant. The prosecution did not provide any evidence that the property had been illegally exploited for any property, valuables, or corrupt, dishonest or illegal means for themselves, or for their spouses or dependents. To show the same, the petition filed for the allotment of plots by the co-accused was submitted with reference, nor were the orders of the allotment kept on record. In such cases, it cannot be said that even the foundations of the crime have begun, with which they were convinced to relieve the accused with the Accountability Bench, and they were based on reasonable reasoning and thereby interference. Was not open for App r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer