Find a Lawyer

ASIM versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-evaluation of the evidence The witness of the prosecution of the imprisoned detainee who presented evidence of credibility and credibility as a natural witness to the incident. There was no enmity and with zero. The real suspect was likely to seek revenge with the applicant, and thus the former was allowed to be released from the skate because of his brother's killer, which in his view led to the death. The defense did not deny his presence on the occasion and has admitted that the injured self-prosecutor was taken to the hospital. The prosecution's witnesses are the star witnesses, he said. He also identified the suspect during the identification parade, which was later performed by a magistrate. The prosecution's witness statement was also accepted by another prosecution witness because he saw the defendant's witness holding a pistol in his hand, and therefore, based on the ocular testimony of the prosecutor's witness, who was identified. It helped. In addition to the parade, as well as another prosecution witness statement related to the material incident, the prosecutor successfully proved the defendant's guilt if the medical evidence was a contradiction of the ocular evidence that would have no effect on the prosecutor's case. Evidence was always considered as confirmation. Evidence and if there is a contradiction between the ocular and the medical evidence, the former will prevail over the latter because it was not the quantity but the quality of the evidence that made it clear that the firearms expert's report on the vacancy and pistol in relation to the crime was lacking. There will be no reflection on the preparation. Because of the prosecution case famous supreme court advocate from Besham lawyer