Section 9 Testimony of Evidence The prosecution witnesses proved the fact of the arrest of the accused while traveling on the bus and the recovery of the prohibited charge from his possession, the fact of the arrest of the accused was not denied. Both witnesses supported one of the prosecution's versions, in its cross-examination clearly stating that four grams of marijuana was separated from a packet for the purpose of chemical analysis and it was not known from the record that Much of the blame can be laid on whether or not chemical analysis samples were obtained from another packet. Samples were received at the Chemical Examiner's office due to the possession of a packet containing Chars Recovery and the accused was not specified in the cases and circumstances related to the delay in the delivery of the sample, much of his sentence. The greater part was to pass, some deserved. The sentence sentenced to the accused has already been reduced and the fine has been reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
