Find a Lawyer

BHAI KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 13 Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 103 reduced the testimony of testimony, the arrest of the accused, and the reduction of both witnesses presented by the prosecution to prove the facts of Kalashnikov's recovery, supported the statements of those witnesses. That were consistent and reliable and there was no reason to dismiss their testimony, the defendant's motion for non-compliance with the provisions of section 103, CRPC, was misunderstood as such. Where the accused suddenly appeared, complying with the provisions of section 103, CRPC was not an absolute requirement of the law, the accused told the prosecution No contradiction or error was identified, and the contradictions appearing in the statements of the prosecution witnesses were trivial and could not be considered sufficient to fail the trial, and the prosecutor was successful in establishing his case. was done. Failure to prove his innocence, be a complainant, a witness to the commission of the crime and even an investigating officer, so far, the accused on the pretext did not seem to have any such prejudice, and it has been fully proven that the accused was guilty Was charged with the charge that he was punished by the accused, however, his case was on his side and the accused deserved some relief under which the trial court found the accused. Was punished, top advocates from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer