Find a Lawyer

SHAUKATULLAH versus STATE

Testimony of the prosecution of the testimony of Section 13 witnesses, on the occasion, presented for the arrest and arrest of the accused, Kalashnikov and the recovery of three magazines, showed full consensus on all important aspects of the case, and the defendants in their statements Could not identify conflicts or errors. So that the prosecution's evidence was very convincing, and there was no hostility or intent to falsely implicate the witness in the case, so the prosecution's witnesses arrested and seized the suspect and Were related to the recovery of ammunition. A lengthy and investigative investigation was carried out, but nothing could be obtained by the defense to refute their statements. Although not sending Kalashnikov to the expert for his opinion, there was a mistake by the investigating officer, The prosecution's case did not prove fatal. The accused is alleged to have owned the property where the bait was allegedly recovered, records did not confirm that the provisions of section 103, CRPC were not complied with because of the raiding and recovery proceedings. No independent witnesses were involved, neither was the accused available because the company had conducted a raid. D-Section P, and other top police officers and those responsible police officers, as a result of a false case, especially when the accused were not charged with any illicit liability in their area. The reasons presented by the trial court cannot be expected. In the absence of any unlawful interference or weakness in the trial court's decision, the trial shall list of supreme court advocates from Kashmir lawyer