Find a Lawyer

DUR-E-NAJAF versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEFENCE, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, ISLAMBAD

Section 68, 84, 90, AA, 100 and 277 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Demanding property tax from a disabled woman exemption from tax, claim for cantonment board was rejected. Either appeal, revise or refer to the Central Government under Sections 99A and 100 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, for the formation of persons with disabilities in the scheme for property tax exemption or against a notice seeking federal objection. The constitutional petition was not enforceable. r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2005

• Mst. SAKINA BIBI KAUSAR through Special Attorney v. Mst. ROBINA KAUSAR 2005 YLR 355
• RAHIM BAKHSH v. QADIR BAKHSH 2005 CLC 356
• SHAKEEL SHAHID v. MUHAMMAD YOUNIS ZAHID 2005 PLD 357
• Pir ABDUL QAYYUM SHAH v. S.H.O. 2005 PCRLJ 357
• MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN v. CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION BOARD, MARKET COMMITTEE KHANPUR 2005 CLC 359
• Messrs MUHAMMAD ALI AND BROTHERS through Managing Partner v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2005 CLD 361
• MUNAWAR IQBAL v. State 2005 PCRLJ 364
• MUNIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD SADDIQUE 2005 MLD 364

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2005 →

law firms from Chohar Jamali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes