Find a Lawyer

MST. SAKINA BIBI KAUSAR THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus MST. ROBINA KAUSAR

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115, O. VIII, R11 and OX, R2 Suite The plaintiff's recording in this statement is a better statement of the gift given by him and his father in favor of the defendant. What was the challenge? Plaintiffs allege that her father was in critical illness and that the defendant's gift to the defendant was registered through fraud and misrepresentation, while the plaintiff's father allegedly filed a lawsuit during the trial. I appeared and recorded my best statement under it, saying that Oaks, R2, CPC, had given his consent in exchange for the services of his second daughter in favor of the plaintiff but Because of this, an additional matter was settled on his father's statement and the appeal was dismissed. After the decision was dismissed, the plaintiff filed a review of the court's decision against the father's statement under OX, R2, that the CPC was not proof because it was not recorded in the presence of the plaintiff. It was held that the plaintiff (father) was not given the opportunity to inspect and that the trial court had deviated from the usual and appropriate procedure prescribed in the CPC and dismissed the claimant's case without giving the eighth clause. Had done. , R 11, CPC, which provided that where the plaintiff did not show cause for action, the plaintiff was obliged to reject and reject, and the orders passed by the following two courts were reviewed by the High Court in a Was set aside and a remand for the trial was obtained. The law, after giving the parties an opportunity to hear and present evidence within a stipulated period when you need a advocate from Jehanian lawyer