Find a Lawyer

MST. LAL KHATOON versus MST. SAHATI

Section 114, 115 (4) and O XLVII, Rr 1 & 7 The review proceedings were an independent and separate proceeding in which it was born and the final decision which was referred to the order, judgment and injunction under cancellation, This order, decision or decree shall not be substantially attributable to the order that was approved as a result of the review and consequently the order, decision, or decision will be freely open for the appeal to be freely appealed. According to the law, provided that the review was a sub-action of the Central Order or that the final form of the order under the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 114 of section 115 Given, CPCCO XLVII, R1 and 7, would disregard the provisions of the CPC, which was apparently not supported. Within the four corners of the AXLVI, R1, CPC, practicing a review of the rules laid down by the Supreme Court in the case reported as PLD 1981 SC 94 Court. The scope had to be limited to limited investigations. Before opening and deciding the case on merit us immigration advocates from Lodhran lawyer