Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. THROUGH ATTORNEY versus GHULAM HAIDER

Sections 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section Oz1 (C) and the removal of services of 12 probationers by the appellant bank against the presiding order by the appellant bank. Was instructed. The Labor Court officer approved the complaint request under which the Labor Court declared the dismissal of the respondents / employees as lawless and instructed the respondents to reinstate the position of employment by the Labor Court. As a result, all previous concessions are valid, which were set on different dates. , Successfully completed its three-month deadline, but was abruptly terminated because it no longer needed the service because it did not meet the required standard responders. Because they had completed the probationary period prescribed by law. By virtue of each of the terms of the contract, there was no justification for terminating their services and it was not until their mark that when the worker completed his probationary period, it would be considered that the employer was doing his work and Was satisfied with the conduct, after the expiry of the trial period, the employee's services could not be terminated on the basis that his work or conduct was not satisfactory. Such termination could not be construed as legal. Nor is the law valid or justifiable to enforce labor laws to protect the interests of the working class, so that they can be employed in the West Pakistan Industrial and Industrial Be protected from arbitrary and unjustified measures jarty employment. (Standing Orders) Order, 1968 ask a advocate free from Khushab lawyer