MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE
Section 11G (1) (a) and 11F (5) (6) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), affirming Section 573, sentenced the court to five years' RI comprehensive sentence and a fine of Rs 50,000 or so. I was fined six months with each RI for confiscating all their immovable and immovable property, which had not been punished for the two offenses for which they were sentenced if the department. Under 11F (5) (6), the accused have been sentenced. The Anti Terrorism Act, 1997; was set aside when he was convicted by the trial court in excess of the maximum sentence of section 11G (2) of the said Act; therefore, in the present circumstances of the trial, Therefore, it was not just irregularity but illegal but justice had suffered and it could not be resolved under 53 537, the CCP convicted and the culprits were set aside. And the case was remanded to the trial court for a proper ruling according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Amangarh lawyer
