Find a Lawyer

MIR MUHAMMAD versus GOVERNOR SINDH/CHANCELLOR SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY, GOVERNOR HOUSE KARACHI

Section 5 (b) (iii) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), the appeal for termination of section 4 services was terminated after charging the charge sheet for corruption and discipline, by the inquiry committee. The appellant was summoned four times, but he never appeared. Prior to the same inquiry committee, the appellant had to submit a warning in such a situation and, after detecting it, proceeded to the previous inquiry case by recording the statements of witnesses in support of the allegations against the appellant, The Inquiry Committee was required to determine the applicant's guilt or any other matter, and the syndicate had to submit its recommendations for the more urgent, but this was not done, nor did the appellant give any warnings or statements. Recorded, nor did the committee determine the offense of the appellant committee which is referred to only Or was For further necessary action on the case syndicate, remand for cases i was obtained after giving the appellant every reasonable opportunity to defend himself, in accordance with law purely ly disciplinary proceedings against the appellant and the recovery of the appellant. But he was to remain under suspension during the interrogation process. jobs for advocates from Issa Khel lawyer