Find a Lawyer

MUBASHAR MANZOOR ALAM versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED

Sections 9, 10, 13, 19 and 22 suit for recovery of civil procedure codes (v. 1908), AXXII, RR 4 (1) (3) (4), 9 (2) and O VIIl, R 13 debt. The bank acquires mortgage from the lenders in the interest of the appellant for the firm and their partnership firm under the credit scheme by the bank acquired by the lender. Failed to fulfill its obligations under the terms of the Agreement. In the interest of the applicants, in the joint application for leave for defense before the banking court hearing, the banking court decided in the interest of the appellant bank against the defendants and the proceedings before the banking court, in which the bank filed the petition. Was implemented. Defendants apply for the rejection of the order, which was dismissed by competent professionals in the interest of the appellant and defendants, as the borrower's legal heir to the appellant. Are real brothers. He filed a joint vacation petition for defense. He acknowledged the bank's claim and in that, the respondents were aware that in the interest of the respondents, the death of the predecessor was, in the circumstances, obligated to inform the Banking Court and the list of legal representatives. The request for leave for defense, which was a legal duty under O VIII, R 13, CPC Appellants, did not file an application within the stipulated time on the basis of such facts and it is unreliable that Was not aware of His original maternal grandmother in question was a party to the suit. pakistani advocates Jhand lawyer