Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE versus SAFDAR OIL AND GENERAL MILLS (PVT.) LTD. JHANG THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Schedule, CL (XIIA) under the Declaration of the Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XNXI of 1948), Sections 12, 13 and 25 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 Charges of less than a fixed charge were provided to the plaintiff's company temporarily connected to the electrical connection under tariff B2 and the same contact remained in place from March 1988 to August 1989, when the connection was restored by the authorities. Demanded fixed charges for this period. The dismissed plaintiff was outraged by the demand for filing a lawsuit, which was ruled by the trial court, and the demand for fixed charges for that period was ruled without any legal authority and the order passed by the trial court was upheld by the appellate court. Which was picked up by the authorities. As the plaintiffs consumers were required to pay the fixed charges during the period of non-availability of electricity and also on disinfection, the Water and Power Development Authority had the right to recover the fixed charges, along with "reserve power" for the consumers. Controversially linked to its obligation, the user had the right to receive the power reservation available on fixed payment. Charges to the Water and Power Development Authority Where the authority was left to assume power termination agreement or terminate contract arrangements, consumers did not demand demanded from Water and Power Development from default charges. can go. The Authority had requested a termination of the contract between the Authority and the Plaintiff for non-payment and the goods were removed and the matter of delivery of the premises and its removal, lawer from fb area from Satyana Bangla lawyer