Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD versus MST. SUGHRAN BIBI THROUGH REPRESENTATIVES

Sec & 42 & 55 55 suits for the declaration that the plaintiff was occupying the shop through a registered sale deed and that the gift deed registered on this shop was illegal and ineffective on the rights of the plaintiffs and further canceled the plaintiff. Was responsible for It was reported that the owner of an SK shop, and after his death transferred a 1 / 4th share to his widow, who sold his share under the registered deed of sale to the plaintiffs and the gift of the land. But it was illegal at the same time that the lawsuit was made and that the shop was not occupied, and neither the declaration nor the gift accepted were valid, the defendants had a gift. There was no Lucas Standie to challenge that property was not occupied. It was a donor to challenge the gift, not the tenant or co-donor / defendant who accepted the gift and reaffirmed this in his written statement. And in his testimony, the claimant's sale in the shop in favor of the claimant was no longer owned by the person, even though the defendant had invalidated the rules in the presence of the gift pledge. online advocate from Piplan lawyer