Find a Lawyer

EHSAN-UL-HAQ versus QAZI MISBAH-UL-HASSAN

A. VIII, R11 Specific Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Reasons for rejecting the constitutional application request, Specific performance of a sales contract based on a sales restitution agreement In the absence of the plaintiff there was a sale agreement with the defendant by the owner of the plot which further implemented the sale agreement with the plaintiff and allowed the defendant to separate the suit plot from anyone else. And the plaintiff had sued for specific performance of the sale agreement and also claimed damages. The defendant filed an application under O VII, R 11 CPC instead of filing a written statement and because the plaintiff had no reason to take action against him, the trial appeal. The court excluded due to the exercise of the certified jurisdiction. Owner of Trial Plot The trial court's order passed by the owner of the trial court's accuracy on the trial owner's objection did not raise any objection, even as a party to the review petition before the Lower Appellate Court. Was not implemented even though it was presented to the plaintiff as the defendant, while the defendant prevented the execution of the contract in favor of the plaintiff from applying it against his words and its contents. The contract was for the specific performance of the contract and consequently a decree for removal was also claimed as relief until the plaintiff rejected the statement citing the statement mentioned in the plaint. While the plaintiff under O. VII, R online advocate from Sambrial lawyer