Find a Lawyer

MST. GHAZALA TARIQ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD AND ANOTHER

RR 4 (1) (b) (iv) and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Maintaining a Constitutional Appeal for the Employment of the Job, whose services were terminated, an order of dismissal before the Service Tribunal on appeal. Challenged, after the employees died during the appeal, his widow moved a request for a preliminary hearing, but said the request filed by the deceased employee and even the appeal was dismissed because of the deceased employee's The widow filed a constitutional petition against the order of retention of the service tribunal. The constitutional petition was objected to by the Authority which was filed by the service tribunal. An appeal was filed due to the death of his employee, his legal heirs could not challenge the order dismissing the appeal in the constitutional petition before the High Court authority failed to prove that any legal investigation against the late. Were done Employee, but it is fully established that this employee was seriously condemned because he was neither given the opportunity of a hearing nor had any regular inquiry against him, the rule of natural justice. Was ordered to terminate the employee in violation, was invalid and if the employee survives without any legal authority, he may have already succeeded before the service tribunal that the late employee's legal heirs Could survive because of the action, and had to protest, stating that the termination order of the terminated employee was unwarranted. It was legal and banned; due to termination of the victim's service, his legal heritage will be discriminated against and termination will be done if the decree continues. famous supreme court advocate from Mohmand lawyer