Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

Arts 100 and 78 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Sections 39 and 42 The declaration and cancellation suit of the registered sale deed was the basis for the claim of the unregistered sale deed plaintiff thirty years ago The availability of evidence was the plaintiff as a party Did not share another. The shareholder of the unregistered sale deed, who lied to the same plaintiff, did not present any revenue record in relation to the suit land or to indicate his status or occupation in relation to the title of the alleged seller of the unregistered sale deed. Neither the unlicensed sale deed dealers, who were alive, nor the slightest evidence presented in the evidence, was one of the alleged registered deed dealers of the unregistered sale deed who was a minor witness Was not introduced, the testimony of the law would exist in 1984 1984 1984 1984 under article under 100 under. Only when a document was proved thirty years old that the condition for attracting such legal ideas was not satisfied was the High Court dismissing the request for review, upholding the appellate court's decision, under which the plaintiff's case Excluded \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Deh Pathaan lawyer