GHULAM SARWAR THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DASKA, DISTRICT SIALKOT
Article Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitution Suit for Retaining Petition The following two courts affirmed the definition of evidence on the record and it was claimed that the plaintiff, who was in possession of the suit property. Was in possession, the plaintiff was forcibly disposed of. Without such consent, such definitions of the evidence filed by the following courts may hardly be possible to interfere with the High Court under its constitutional jurisdiction whereby the two courts record the record of the possession of the plaintiff. Detecting and disposing of it by the defendants was purely a question. Reality and constitutional jurisdiction were not intended to interfere with a determination that the doctrine adopted by the courts below was not subject to any illegal or permanent error in order to guarantee the intervention of the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
