Find a Lawyer

MST. SADDAN versus STATE

The appeal against the trial against the accused was section 249A, 417 (2A), 561A panel code (XLV of 1860), section 379/440/148/149 and the accused only for further remand. Submitted when he was acquitted on the charge that this was not a phase of exercise of powers under Section 249A, the CRPC accused was acquitted at any stage of the trial under Section 249A, CRPC. Can be declared, but during the trial which began after the filing of the report under Section 173. , CRPC Trial Court had committed material illegal proceedings in approving the magistrate who had been illegally acquitted under Section 249A, CRPC was bound to issue a notice to the state and that both parties Discretion can be exercised only after the hearing, but after submitting the challan, the court also found the case invalid during the investigation and recommended that the accused be dismissed, if any. When the report was presented to the magistrate, it was directed. That the magistrate pass the law in accordance with the law, the controversial injunction against refusing to accept the appeal was set aside and the case was remanded for further judgment. immigration advocates contact from Yazman Mandi lawyer